- The complexity of the web and its structure
- How large corporations are revolutionize the way we've done things in the past
- The changing politics of knowledge- how its users are gaining importance and experts are losing ground
- How every individual is responsible for adding value
In several cases the examples they use are the same: iTunes changing the structure of music, Wikipedia's users making it more valuable than traditional encylopedias, companies using users to make more profit, and Amazon's recommendations exposing new ways to buy things.
Where they differ should also be noted. O'Reilly was discussing the web in relation to itself as they very title suggests. It's not just the web, it's Web 2.0, or its Web squared.. O'Reilly's point was that the Web is improving and changing business and the social world. Weinberger isn't just discussing the web; he's discussing far more epistemological implications about organization, our worldview, and categorization. Weinberger's book is far more comprehensively approaching our society and how it organizes things. He looks not only at the Web and how its getting better or revolutionizing business, but how it is different from the physical world and the way we have organized things before the web existed. This is not a primary consideration of O'Reilly's, who focused mostly on the development of the Web and the development of it for fiscal purposes.
Good overall post, but a lot of this could've come straight from class (which is fine to a point, but...). In order for me to see you're doing the reading, you need to work on making direct references (quotes will really help, if not very specific summaries).
ReplyDelete